Back to Reports
Annual Audit Report·2024·Qualified · Opinion·English

Audited Annual Financial Statements FY 2024, English Version

Puntland State Government (Whole of Government) · Published June 30, 2025

Executive Summary

The audited Annual Financial Statements of the Puntland State Government for the fiscal year ended 31 December 2024, prepared by the Office of the Accountant General and audited by the Office of the Auditor General in accordance with ISSAIs. The Auditor General issued a Qualified Opinion. The basis for qualification includes expenditures of $12,489,662.38 not fully supported by appropriate documentation, and misclassification of expenditure. The report's emphasis-of-matter section highlights discrepancies in closing and opening balances, absence of bank reconciliation, weaknesses in government procurement (single-source awards bypassing open bidding), off-budget funds excluded from the Central Treasury Account, the approved 2024 budget was $395,359,029 while the financial report submitted by the Accountant General reflected only $156,778,675, a lack of a comprehensive debt registry, an incomplete government asset register, and incomplete revenue documentation. Nine UN agencies reported implementing projects worth $123,401,500 in Puntland for which no audited financial statements were provided.

Audit Findings

F-001

Incomplete Supporting Documentation of Expenditures ($12.49M)

High Risk
Criteria

All government expenditure must be fully supported by appropriate documentation identifying the correct beneficiary.

Condition (What we found)

Expenditures amounting to $12,489,662.38 were not fully supported by appropriate documentation and were recorded under incorrect beneficiary names, including $7,564,770.00 confirmed paid by central bank officials but lacking adequate documentation, $1,434,051.70 for travel and medical assistance, $1,173,588.68 processed without the required Expenditure Authorization, and $1,450,000.00 improperly charged to the wrong budget head.

Cause (Why it happened)

Weak expenditure documentation and authorization controls.

Effect (Impact)

Auditors could not verify that the funds were used for their intended purposes, a basis for the qualified opinion.

Recommendation

Enforce complete supporting documentation and correct beneficiary recording for every payment before processing.

F-002

Misclassification of Expenditure

Medium Risk
Criteria

Expenditure must be recorded against the correct budget heads and classifications.

Condition (What we found)

Expenditure was recorded under incorrect classifications, including $1,450,000.00 improperly charged to the wrong budget head.

Cause (Why it happened)

Weak controls over expenditure coding and budget-head discipline.

Effect (Impact)

The financial statements do not accurately reflect the nature of spending, a basis for the qualified opinion.

Recommendation

Strengthen review of expenditure classification at entry and during monthly closes.

F-003

Off-Budget Funds Excluded from the Central Treasury Account ($238.58M)

High Risk
Criteria

The approved budget should be executed through the Government's Central Treasury for full accountability.

Condition (What we found)

The approved 2024 budget was $395,359,029.00, but the financial report submitted by the Accountant General reflected only $156,778,675.00. The $238,580,354.00 difference arose from funds that did not pass through the Central Treasury, particularly international agencies and local governments.

Cause (Why it happened)

Donor and local-government funds executed outside the Treasury Single Account framework.

Effect (Impact)

A majority of the approved budget falls outside the audited central accounts, limiting accountability over public resources.

Recommendation

Bring off-budget flows progressively into the Central Treasury Account and require accountability reporting from implementing agencies.

F-004

UN Agency Projects Without Accountability Reports ($123.4M)

High Risk
Criteria

Funds implemented on behalf of the public should be supported by audited financial statements or accountability reports.

Condition (What we found)

Nine UN agencies reported implementing projects in Puntland worth a total of $123,401,500.00, but the Auditor General received no supporting financial documentation or audited statements and did not audit those funds.

Cause (Why it happened)

No framework obliging implementing agencies to submit accountability reports to the supreme audit institution.

Effect (Impact)

Significant development resources remain outside any local audit assurance.

Recommendation

Establish reporting and audit-access arrangements with international implementing agencies.

F-005

Weaknesses in Government Procurement

High Risk
Criteria

Public contracts must be awarded through competitive open bidding unless a documented exception applies.

Condition (What we found)

Contracts including renovations and road works were awarded using non-competitive (single-source) methods, bypassing the required open bidding process.

Cause (Why it happened)

Procurement rules not consistently applied.

Effect (Impact)

Reduced value for money and elevated corruption risk in public contracting.

Recommendation

Subject qualifying contracts to open bidding and document justifications for any exception.

F-006

Discrepancies in Closing and Opening Balances

Medium Risk
Criteria

Closing balances must roll forward accurately into opening balances of the following year.

Condition (What we found)

The audit identified discrepancies between closing and opening balances.

Cause (Why it happened)

Weak year-end closing procedures.

Effect (Impact)

Reduced reliability of the financial statements.

Recommendation

Implement controlled year-end close with documented reconciliation of carried-forward balances.

F-007

Absence of Bank Reconciliation

High Risk
Criteria

Government bank accounts must be reconciled regularly against the accounting records.

Condition (What we found)

Bank reconciliations were not performed.

Cause (Why it happened)

Reconciliation function not operating.

Effect (Impact)

Errors or misappropriation affecting cash balances may go undetected.

Recommendation

Institute monthly bank reconciliations with independent review and sign-off.

F-008

Lack of Comprehensive Debt Registry

Medium Risk
Criteria

Government must maintain a comprehensive register of public debt.

Condition (What we found)

The Government lacks a comprehensive debt register to track its obligations.

Cause (Why it happened)

Debt recording framework not established.

Effect (Impact)

Public debt cannot be reliably reported or managed.

Recommendation

Establish and maintain a complete, regularly verified debt registry.

F-009

Incomplete Asset Register and Revenue Documentation

Medium Risk
Criteria

Government must maintain complete asset registers and revenue documentation.

Condition (What we found)

The government asset register and revenue documentation were incomplete.

Cause (Why it happened)

Weak record-keeping over assets and revenue collection.

Effect (Impact)

Risk of asset loss and unverifiable revenue.

Recommendation

Complete physical asset verification and enforce full revenue documentation.

Recommendations Tracker

RefAction RequiredStatus
R-001Channel budget execution through the Central Treasury Account and obtain accountability reports from implementing agenciesIn Progress
R-002Enforce complete supporting documentation and Expenditure Authorization for all paymentsIn Progress
R-003Institute monthly bank reconciliations across government accountsOutstanding

Audit Details

Ministry
Puntland State Government (Whole of Government)
Audit Period
Fiscal Year 2024 (January – December 2024)
Published
June 30, 2025
Audit Team
Office of the Auditor General, Puntland
Expenditure Audited
$156.78M via Central Treasury

Findings Summary

High Risk
5
Medium Risk
4
Low Risk
0
Total Findings9

Download Report

Official document · English · PDF · 7.3 MB

Download PDF